AI Security Testing
Reviews prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, unsafe tool use, data exposure, RAG poisoning, memory poisoning, and other abuse paths without publishing exploit details.
NAIGIS Cognitive is designed to test AI systems, LLMs, copilots, and autonomous agents before public trust claims are made. The goal is not to call AI universally safe. The goal is to make tested scope, known limitations, restrictions, review state, and public remedies clear.
Public pages summarize status and restrictions. Sensitive prompts, exploit details, private customer data, and non-public remediation records are not exposed through public disclosure pages.
Reviews prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, unsafe tool use, data exposure, RAG poisoning, memory poisoning, and other abuse paths without publishing exploit details.
Compares current behavior against the approved baseline for model, prompt, retrieval, memory, tool, refusal, and decision consistency changes.
Looks for deception, unsupported claims, fabricated evidence, covert tool use, sabotage signals, collusion, and policy evasion.
Evaluates scam enablement, misinformation, impersonation, financial manipulation, medical or legal misinformation, discrimination risk, child safety, and public safety harms.
Uses adversarial test campaigns and remediation review before higher-risk systems can claim a stronger trust posture.
Tracks post-certification changes, complaints, incidents, model updates, prompt updates, tool changes, and safety signals.
Separates verified capabilities from unsupported claims, flags false completion claims, records corrections, and discloses when human supervision is required.
An AI system should not claim safety, reliability, completion, production readiness, or public trust unless the claim is supported by records that can be reviewed.